Free CopyDoc tool

See where your copy becomes harder than it needs to be.

Measure English copy with established readability formulas, sentence and word-length statistics, and a practical list of dense sentences to review.

Use the free tool
  • No signup
  • Free to use
  • A focused English readability report

Free browser tool

Readability score checker

Your files and inputs are processed locally in this browser and are not uploaded to Hypermatic.

Paste English prose to estimate its reading level and find dense sentences.

Readability formulas measure sentence and word patterns, not accuracy, tone or subject difficulty.

Managing copy across real designs?

Sync, localize, and update Figma content at scale with CopyDoc.

This free tool checks one content or localization input. CopyDoc handles the recurring production workflow across Figma designs, spreadsheets, localization files, variables, images, styles, and layouts.

CopyDoc

コピー

Stop manual text updates.

Export, import, localize, and sync text, images, styles, and layouts across Figma designs.

126k+ installs

How it works

From input to useful result in three steps.

  1. 1

    Paste the final or draft English copy.

  2. 2

    Review its reading-ease score, estimated grade level, and sentence-length outliers.

  3. 3

    Rewrite the dense sections and compare the updated result.

Questions

Readability score checker FAQ

Which readability formulas are used?

The checker reports Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level using estimated English syllable counts.

Can a readability score prove that copy is clear?

No. Formulas measure surface characteristics. Meaning, context, accuracy, tone, accessibility, and audience knowledge still require human review.

Is the readability score checker free?

Yes. You can use it without an account or signup, and the result is generated directly in your browser.

Free practical guide

How to use a readability score checker

Measure English copy with established readability formulas, sentence and word-length statistics, and a practical list of dense sentences to review. This guide explains what the result means, how to avoid the most common interpretation mistakes, and when the related CopyDoc workflow becomes the more practical next step.

Quick answer

Paste the final or draft English copy. Review its reading-ease score, estimated grade level, and sentence-length outliers. Rewrite the dense sections and compare the updated result. The tool is free to use without an account, and your files and inputs are processed locally in this browser and are not uploaded to Hypermatic.

What does the readability score checker do?

Measure English copy with established readability formulas, sentence and word-length statistics, and a practical list of dense sentences to review. The immediate result is a focused English readability report. That makes the tool useful when a focused question needs an answer before a file is handed off, a campaign is trafficked, or a production workflow begins.

The scope is intentionally narrow. It is designed for checking one set of strings, localization files, or copy constraints, not for replacing the complete production process. A useful result should make the next decision clearer while leaving the original file, design, or workflow under the user’s control.

Your files and inputs are processed locally in this browser and are not uploaded to Hypermatic. Local processing reduces unnecessary data exposure, but it does not remove the need to follow the privacy, confidentiality, and retention requirements that apply to the source material.

How should the readability score checker be used?

Start with the same input that will be used in production whenever possible. Draft content, substitute files, and approximate dimensions can be useful during exploration, but the final check should use the actual export, final copy, destination, or supported range.

Work through the steps in order and keep the generated result beside the source. If the result identifies a warning, decide whether it is a real production problem, an acceptable tradeoff, or a limitation of a browser-based inspection before changing the underlying work.

  • Paste the final or draft English copy.
  • Review its reading-ease score, estimated grade level, and sentence-length outliers.
  • Rewrite the dense sections and compare the updated result.

How should the result be interpreted?

A browser tool can make measurable signals visible, but it cannot reproduce every application, platform, rendering engine, policy, or team constraint. Treat the report as evidence for a decision rather than a universal guarantee. The strongest verification is the source content system, linguistic review, runtime placeholders, and the final Figma layouts.

Pay particular attention to edge cases that are easy to miss during a quick check: unusual fonts, long or localized content, hidden metadata, external dependencies, different aspect ratios, browser-specific behavior, and last-minute source changes. Re-run the tool whenever the production input changes materially.

  • Prefer familiar words when they express the same idea accurately.
  • Break long sentences where each half can stand on its own.
  • Do not simplify specialist language that the intended audience genuinely needs.

Common questions about readability score checker

Which readability formulas are used? The checker reports Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level using estimated English syllable counts.

Can a readability score prove that copy is clear? No. Formulas measure surface characteristics. Meaning, context, accuracy, tone, accessibility, and audience knowledge still require human review.

Is the readability score checker free? Yes. You can use it without an account or signup, and the result is generated directly in your browser.

When does CopyDoc become the better workflow?

The free tool is the right choice for a quick individual check, calculation, preview, or template. It remains useful even if the task only occurs once and no broader production workflow is needed.

CopyDoc becomes more practical when the same job turns into syncing, localizing, importing, and updating content across complete Figma designs. At that point, keeping the work close to the Figma source reduces repeated exports, copy-and-paste steps, inconsistent decisions, and handoff drift.

Before adopting any workflow, compare the time spent on the recurring manual process with the setup and review required by the tool. The goal is not to add another application; it is to remove repetitive work while preserving the quality checks that still need human judgment.