Preflight the Performance Max asset group before trafficking.

What does the performance max asset checker do?

Inspect marketing images locally and count text assets against representative Google Performance Max ratios, dimensions, file sizes, minimum quantities, and character limits. The immediate result is a Performance Max image and copy readiness report. That makes the tool useful when a focused question needs an answer before a file is handed off, a campaign is trafficked, or a production workflow begins.

The scope is intentionally narrow. It is designed for checking one banner asset or preparing one trafficking brief, not for replacing the complete production process. A useful result should make the next decision clearer while leaving the original file, design, or workflow under the user’s control.

Your files and inputs are processed locally in this browser and are not uploaded to Hypermatic. Local processing reduces unnecessary data exposure, but it does not remove the need to follow the privacy, confidentiality, and retention requirements that apply to the source material.

How should the performance max asset checker be used?

Start with the same input that will be used in production whenever possible. Draft content, substitute files, and approximate dimensions can be useful during exploration, but the final check should use the actual export, final copy, destination, or supported range.

Work through the steps in order and keep the generated result beside the source. If the result identifies a warning, decide whether it is a real production problem, an acceptable tradeoff, or a limitation of a browser-based inspection before changing the underlying work.

• Choose the campaign image set and paste each text variation on its own line.
• Review required landscape and square coverage, dimensions, file weights, counts, and copy lengths.
• Correct the source assets and confirm current requirements in Google Ads before upload.

How should the result be interpreted?

A browser tool can make measurable signals visible, but it cannot reproduce every application, platform, rendering engine, policy, or team constraint. Treat the report as evidence for a decision rather than a universal guarantee. The strongest verification is the final uploaded preview and the current requirements of the destination ad platform.

Pay particular attention to edge cases that are easy to miss during a quick check: unusual fonts, long or localized content, hidden metadata, external dependencies, different aspect ratios, browser-specific behavior, and last-minute source changes. Re-run the tool whenever the production input changes materially.

• Provide genuinely different creative options instead of superficial crops or punctuation variants.
• Keep important artwork within crop-safe areas across placements.
• Platform requirements change, so the live campaign interface remains the final authority.

Common questions about performance max asset checker

Does this upload assets to Google Ads? No. Files and copy are checked locally. The tool does not connect to a Google account or create a campaign.

Does passing guarantee approval or performance? No. It checks selected production constraints, not policy compliance, creative quality, landing-page quality, approval, or campaign performance.

Is the performance max asset checker free? Yes. You can use it without an account or signup. The focused result is generated directly in your browser.

When does Bannerify become the better workflow?

The free tool is the right choice for a quick individual check, calculation, preview, or template. It remains useful even if the task only occurs once and no broader production workflow is needed.

Bannerify becomes more practical when the same job turns into animating, adapting, naming, and exporting complete campaign banner sets. At that point, keeping the work close to the Figma source reduces repeated exports, copy-and-paste steps, inconsistent decisions, and handoff drift.

Before adopting any workflow, compare the time spent on the recurring manual process with the setup and review required by the tool. The goal is not to add another application; it is to remove repetitive work while preserving the quality checks that still need human judgment.