HTML5 banner ad preflight checker
Inspect an HTML file or ZIP package for declared dimensions, clickTag signals, file weight, external resources, and common packaging mistakes.
Use free toolEstimate the time and labour tied up in recurring production work, then compare a tailored plugin stack with the Hypermatic Pro Bundle.
Use the free toolFree browser tool
Calculations stay in this browser. Contact details are only stored if you request tailored recommendations.
Your planning estimate
Recommended stack
This is an illustrative planning estimate based on your inputs, 48 working weeks, and current listed monthly prices. It is not a guarantee of savings.
Ready to remove more of the manual work?
The calculator estimates the opportunity. The Pro Bundle supplies all 12 Hypermatic plugins under one license for production, content, handoff, feedback, file conversion, and QA workflows.
How it works
Enter your team size, blended hourly cost, and weekly time spent on repetitive Figma production work.
Choose the workflows your team regularly handles and estimate how much of that work could reasonably be automated.
Compare the potential annual value with the recommended plugins, then copy the business case or request tailored recommendations.
Questions
The calculator multiplies team size, weekly repetitive hours, blended hourly cost, 48 working weeks, and the automatable share you select. It does not assume that every hour can or should be removed.
Each selected workflow maps to the Hypermatic plugin built for that recurring job. The calculator compares the combined monthly price of those individual plugins with the current Pro Bundle price.
The calculation runs locally in your browser. If you request tailored recommendations, the submitted email, team profile, calculator inputs, and recommended products are stored so Hypermatic can respond.
Free practical guide
Estimate the time and labour tied up in recurring production work, then compare a tailored plugin stack with the Hypermatic Pro Bundle. This guide explains what the result means, how to avoid the most common interpretation mistakes, and when the related Hypermatic Pro Bundle workflow becomes the more practical next step.
Quick answer
Enter your team size, blended hourly cost, and weekly time spent on repetitive Figma production work. Choose the workflows your team regularly handles and estimate how much of that work could reasonably be automated. Compare the potential annual value with the recommended plugins, then copy the business case or request tailored recommendations. The tool is free to use without an account, and calculations stay in this browser. Contact details are only stored if you request tailored recommendations.
Estimate the time and labour tied up in recurring production work, then compare a tailored plugin stack with the Hypermatic Pro Bundle. The immediate result is a tailored ROI estimate and recommended plugin stack. That makes the tool useful when a focused question needs an answer before a file is handed off, a campaign is trafficked, or a production workflow begins.
The scope is intentionally narrow. It is designed for estimating the cost of recurring production work and choosing an automation stack, not for replacing the complete production process. A useful result should make the next decision clearer while leaving the original file, design, or workflow under the user’s control.
Calculations stay in this browser. Contact details are only stored if you request tailored recommendations. Local processing reduces unnecessary data exposure, but it does not remove the need to follow the privacy, confidentiality, and retention requirements that apply to the source material.
Start with the same input that will be used in production whenever possible. Draft content, substitute files, and approximate dimensions can be useful during exploration, but the final check should use the actual export, final copy, destination, or supported range.
Work through the steps in order and keep the generated result beside the source. If the result identifies a warning, decide whether it is a real production problem, an acceptable tradeoff, or a limitation of a browser-based inspection before changing the underlying work.
A browser tool can make measurable signals visible, but it cannot reproduce every application, platform, rendering engine, policy, or team constraint. Treat the report as evidence for a decision rather than a universal guarantee. The strongest verification is a representative week of team activity followed by a small real-world trial of the recommended workflows.
Pay particular attention to edge cases that are easy to miss during a quick check: unusual fonts, long or localized content, hidden metadata, external dependencies, different aspect ratios, browser-specific behavior, and last-minute source changes. Re-run the tool whenever the production input changes materially.
How is the potential annual value calculated? The calculator multiplies team size, weekly repetitive hours, blended hourly cost, 48 working weeks, and the automatable share you select. It does not assume that every hour can or should be removed.
How are plugins recommended? Each selected workflow maps to the Hypermatic plugin built for that recurring job. The calculator compares the combined monthly price of those individual plugins with the current Pro Bundle price.
Does Hypermatic store the calculator answers? The calculation runs locally in your browser. If you request tailored recommendations, the submitted email, team profile, calculator inputs, and recommended products are stored so Hypermatic can respond.
The free tool is the right choice for a quick individual check, calculation, preview, or template. It remains useful even if the task only occurs once and no broader production workflow is needed.
Hypermatic Pro Bundle becomes more practical when the same job turns into running several production, content, handoff, feedback, conversion, and QA workflows inside Figma. At that point, keeping the work close to the Figma source reduces repeated exports, copy-and-paste steps, inconsistent decisions, and handoff drift.
Before adopting any workflow, compare the time spent on the recurring manual process with the setup and review required by the tool. The goal is not to add another application; it is to remove repetitive work while preserving the quality checks that still need human judgment.